Eric, Any feedback on this? From looking at the code I am pretty sure I have only restored things to the order where they were before the cleanup patch but you obviously know the code better than I possibly could.
As this is a regression I would like to get this resolved before long. thanks, - Doug On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 15:59 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: > Patch for: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8426 > > A recent code cleanup that moved code from mptscsih to mptspi > inadvertently change the order some code was called. This caused > a massive slowdown (of 150x to 300x) on the CD/DVD drive on the > high-end HP Integrity servers. > > Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c > index 85f21b5..2eb5741 100644 > --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c > @@ -726,13 +726,15 @@ static int mptspi_slave_configure(struct scsi_device > *sdev) > struct _MPT_SCSI_HOST *hd = > (struct _MPT_SCSI_HOST *)sdev->host->hostdata; > VirtTarget *vtarget = scsi_target(sdev)->hostdata; > - int ret = mptscsih_slave_configure(sdev); > + int ret; > + > + mptspi_initTarget(hd, vtarget, sdev); > + > + ret = mptscsih_slave_configure(sdev); > > if (ret) > return ret; > > - mptspi_initTarget(hd, vtarget, sdev); > - > ddvprintk((MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT "id=%d min_period=0x%02x" > " max_offset=0x%02x max_width=%d\n", hd->ioc->name, > sdev->id, spi_min_period(scsi_target(sdev)), > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
