David C Somayajulu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: David Somayajulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_def.h | 84 ++++---
> drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_fw.h | 426
> +++++++++++++++---------------------
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_def.h b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_def.h
> index 6f4cf2d..7bbc2ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_def.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_def.h
> @@ -122,8 +122,7 @@ #define MAX_REQS_SERVICED_PER_INTR 16
>
> #define ISCSI_IPADDR_SIZE 4 /* IP address size */
> #define ISCSI_ALIAS_SIZE 32 /* ISCSI Alais name size */
> -#define ISCSI_NAME_SIZE 255 /* ISCSI Name size -
> - * usually a string */
> +#define ISCSI_NAME_SIZE 0xE0 /* ISCSI Name size */
>
> #define LSDW(x) ((u32)((u64)(x)))
> #define MSDW(x) ((u32)((((u64)(x)) >> 16) >> 16))
> @@ -159,6 +158,7 @@ struct srb {
> struct ddb_entry *ddb;
> uint16_t flags; /* (1) Status flags. */
>
> +#define SRB_SCSI_PASSTHRU BIT_2 /* for scsi passthru cmds */
Is this ever set or is the passthrough code in these patches ever used
or hit in upstream code or is it going to be used? It is doing the same
thing as sg io or is it different?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
