From: Douglas Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sg version 4 tools
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:25:52 -0800

> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I created a git tree for makeshift sg version 4 tools:
> > 
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/tomo/sgv4-tools.git;a=summary

(snip)

> Tomo,
> Just a few points.
> 
> While the sgv4_dd command line interface (cli) looks
> sensible, it diverges from the dd command (which is
> non-unix like but reasonably "fit for service" for the
> function that dd performs). So even though the Unix dd
> command syntax takes a while to get used to, other testers
> will be most likely to be comfortable with existing dd syntax.

Yeah, probably. Patches are always welcome. :) It's just a simple tool
that I've used for development.


> In summary, I don't think that there needs to be a
> sg4_utils. As you suggest, sgv4_dd can be incorporated
> into the existing sg3_utils at a convenient time.
> sg v4 represents an alternate interface for a linux
> pass-through and the bulk of sg3_utils already supports
> 4 pass-throughs via a common code base. [The four are
> linux (sg v3), FreeBSD, Tru64, Windows (from NT forward).]

Agreed. Surely, I don't want to maintain sgv4_utils. I'm thinking
about keeping it until we finish some experiments on sgv4 interface
(like ring buffer).

If you add sgv4 support to sg3_utils now, I'm happy to remove the git
tree. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to