On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:16:15AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 17:10 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > Seems I'm not the only one sending posts to the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bit bucket. > > > > Could the maintainer of lsml either: > > - get rid of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - or forward posts in there to lsml > > > > That bright idea might save the maintainer time but > > it wastes ours. > > I think it's a majordomo feature ... you need misdelivered or > undelivered emails not to come back to the list, so the return-path: is > set to the owner list (so they can be removed from the email list). > > In theory, a mailer should never reply to the return path, so how are > you getting this in your reply path? > > James
No, linux-scsi -list does not set that as "Reply-To:" That behaviour is seen commonly in LAN "email" systems, which are unable to differentiate information carried in SMTP level transport vs. what is in the visible headers. I let you figure out yourself whose email server "product" should not be connected into the Internet because it is unable to handle these fundamental differentiations in the internet email.. /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
