On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 14:46 -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > Did you test with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB enabled?
Yes, but only on an ia64. > I have a workaround for problems with device_for_each_child() not being > "safe", I'm trying to verify it right now, but the underlying problem is > in klist_next(), I don't have a general solution for it (it looks hard to > fix). Could you elaborate ... the principle (hold refs to the node until you've extracted the next pointer) looks sound to me, even in the face of deletion. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
