On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:32:44AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:43:03AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:25:25PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > Eww. Do you really want one struct device per tty with all the > > > memory each one eats? > > > > > > If that's really what you want you need to talk to Alan and not me. > > > Alan looks after tty level stuff, I look after serial level stuff. > > > The above is a tty level issue not a serial level issue. > > > > mmm. I don't know whether it's really a tty level issue or a serial > > issue. The only tty classes with corresponding devices are the serial > > ones, at least on my system. If this is the case, then the right fix > > would seem to be something like creating a new struct device for each > > serial port, then making that the uart_port->dev instead of the pci_dev > > or whatever. > > What's the reason for enforcing one struct device per struct class_dev ? > I thought one of the points of class_dev was that you could have multiple > of them per struct device.
No such enforcement is needed at all, and not encouraged. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
