On 15.08.2005 [20:34:27 +0000], Willem Riede wrote: > On 08/15/2005 02:27:51 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Description: Use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() instead of > > set_current_state()/schedule_timeout() to reduce kernel size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/scsi/osst.c | 9 +++------ > > > > diff -urpN 2.6.13-rc5-mm1/drivers/scsi/osst.c > > 2.6.13-rc5-mm1-dev/drivers/scsi/osst.c > > --- 2.6.13-rc5-mm1/drivers/scsi/osst.c 2005-08-07 10:05:21.000000000 > > -0700 > > +++ 2.6.13-rc5-mm1-dev/drivers/scsi/osst.c 2005-08-12 > > 13:42:13.000000000 -0700 > > @@ -862,8 +862,7 @@ static int osst_recover_wait_frame(struc > > retval = osst_write_error_recovery(STp, > > aSRpnt, 0); > > break; > > } > > - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > - schedule_timeout (HZ / OSST_POLL_PER_SEC); > > + schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ / > OSST_POLL_PER_SEC); > > Others have suggested using msleep in osst instead of schedule, which I think > is > more appropriate.
That's my fault, you are right, a patch for msleep() usage in OSST already exists in the latest -KJ patchset and covers all these changes. I tried to avoid collisions between existing changes in -KJ and these new ones in -MM, but must have missed this one. Thanks, Nish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
