On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 13:06 -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > The code does not 'damage' the scsi-misc tree version, so why not apply > it to the scsi-misc tree as well at least to make sure it does not > (extending the test coverage)? What is the scsi-block timetable for > downstream?
OK, that's true ... there's no reason not to. > I have almost religiously applied all patches that touch the driver to > the Adaptec branch here. The net result is I have caught some gaffs > early on because we always have some test or Q/A program ready to give > it coverage. Yes, early and often ... just in case the scsi-block merge gets delayed again. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
