James' patch is fine!

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Haverkamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 5:45 PM
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Salyzyn, Mark; SCSI Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aacraid: correct use of cmd->timeout field

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 16:31 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> The cmd->timeout field has been obsolete for a while now.  While
looking
> to remove it, I came across this use in the aacraid driver.  It looks
> like you want to initialise the firmware with the current timeout of
the
> command (in seconds), so the value I think you should be using is cmd-
> >timeout_per_command.

It looks that way to me too.   Is scsicmd->timeout even set anywhere? I
didn't find any.

Mark.

> 
> James
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
> @@ -1894,7 +1893,7 @@ static int aac_send_srb_fib(struct scsi_
>       srbcmd->id   = cpu_to_le32(scsicmd->device->id);
>       srbcmd->lun      = cpu_to_le32(scsicmd->device->lun);
>       srbcmd->flags    = cpu_to_le32(flag);
> -     timeout = (scsicmd->timeout-jiffies)/HZ;
> +     timeout = scsicmd->timeout_per_command/HZ;
>       if(timeout == 0){
>               timeout = 1;
>       }
> 
-- 
Mark Haverkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to