Masao Fukuchi reported an issue when the outstanding mf queue was being flushed in contents of slave_destroy, the scsi dev was offlined already by the mid-layer.
They may not be an issue anymore since I removed the error handling timers from mptscsih. Masao can you validate this pls? Christoph Hellwig, wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:35:57PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Eric. > > Hello, James. > > > > I've been working on new SCSI state model and was checking on > > scsi_device_online() users. As the state model is going to > change, I > > need to audit device state usages in lldd's and I'm having difficult > > time understanding why scsi_device_online() is used in mptscsih. > > > > In mptscsih.c, mptscsih_flush_running_cmds() uses > > scsi_device_online() to determine whether or not dma-unmap data area > > of active commands. This was added in the changeset 1.1371.776.1 by > > Eric Moore with the comment "MPT Fusion add back FC909 > support". Can > > you please explain me why and how scsi_device_online() condition is > > used here? > > I brought that issue up a while ago, but we didn't really get > anywhere, > see the "fix dma mapping leak in fusion" thread on linux-scsi. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
