On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 13:50 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Well, but it's because scsi midlayer calls back into usb-storage eh > after the detaching process is complete.
Yes, but that's legitimate. It's always been explicitly stated that we can't ensure absolute synchronisation in the stack: storage devices must expect to have to reject I/O for devices they think have been removed. > > However, the current host code does need fixing, but the fix is to move > > it over to a proper state model rather than the current bit twiddling we > > do. > > I agree & am working on it. This patch was mainly to verify Jens' oops. Thanks! You can look at the device state model as a guide ... originally that was a bit mask too. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
