On Tue, Oct 31 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday October 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm guessing we need
> > > 
> > > diff .prev/block/elevator.c ./block/elevator.c
> > > --- .prev/block/elevator.c        2006-10-31 20:06:22.000000000 +1100
> > > +++ ./block/elevator.c    2006-10-31 20:06:40.000000000 +1100
> > > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static void __elv_unregister_queue(eleva
> > >  
> > >  void elv_unregister_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > >  {
> > > - if (q)
> > > + if (q && q->elevator)
> > >           __elv_unregister_queue(q->elevator);
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jens?  md never registers and elevator for its queue.
> > 
> > Hmm, but blk_unregister_queue() doesn't call elv_unregister_queue()
> > unless q->request_fn is set. And in that case, you must have an io
> > scheduler attached.
> 
> Hmm.. yes.  Oh, I get it.  I have
> 
>       blk_cleanup_queue(mddev->queue);
>       mddev->queue = NULL;
>       del_gendisk(mddev->gendisk);
>       mddev->gendisk = NULL;
> 
> That's the wrong order, isn't it. :-(

Yep, you want to reverse that :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to