NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
>  Andrew: Are you happy to keep collecting these as a list of patches
>  (bugs followed by bug-fixes :-), or would it be easier if I merged all
>  the bug fixes into earlier patches and just resent a small number of
>  "add-functionality" patches??

What I'll generally do is to topologically sort the patches.  Work out what
patch each of the new patches fix and then rename the patches to
name-of-the-patch-whcih-is-being-fixed-fix.patch.

So if you had

        foo.patch
        bar.patch

and then sent be "[patch] frob the nozzle"

I'd work out that this new patch is fixing foo.patch and I'd name it
"foo-fix.patch" and the sequence would become:

        foo.patch
        foo-fix.patch
        bar.patch

and then at some time in the future I'll collapse foo-fix.patch,
foo-fix-fix.patch, etc into foo.patch.

Of course it doesn't always work out that simply ;)

In this case it's not clear that a tsort will work out right.  I'll take a
look.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to