Hi Junghak,
A few small comments...
On 22-09-15 15:30, Junghak Sung wrote:
> Move v4l2-specific stuff from videobu2-core to videobuf2-v4l2
> without doing any functional changes.
I feel the introduction of v4l2_buf_ops falls under functional changes.
Is it possible to do that change in a separate patch before this one?
>
> Signed-off-by: Junghak Sung <jh1009.s...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Geunyoung Kim <nenggun....@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312....@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki....@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 1872
> +-------------------------
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-internal.h | 161 +++
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 1678 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 118 +-
> include/media/videobuf2-dvb.h | 8 +-
> include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h | 96 ++
> 6 files changed, 2009 insertions(+), 1924 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-internal.h
>
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> index 2f2b738..8ca07bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> +
> +const struct vb2_buf_ops v4l2_buf_ops = {
Shouldn't this be static?
> + .fill_user_buffer = __fill_v4l2_buffer,
> + .fill_vb2_buffer = __fill_vb2_buffer,
> + .set_timestamp = __set_timestamp,
> +};
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
