On 03/17/2014 12:44 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Saturday 15 March 2014 14:08:00 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
>>
>> The notify function is a void function, yet the v4l2_subdev_notify
>> define uses it in a ? : construction, which causes sparse warnings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
>> ---
>> include/media/v4l2-subdev.h | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>> index 28f4d8c..0fbf669 100644
>> --- a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>> @@ -692,9 +692,11 @@ void v4l2_subdev_init(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
>> (sd)->ops->o->f((sd) , ##args) : -ENOIOCTLCMD))
>>
>> /* Send a notification to v4l2_device. */
>> -#define v4l2_subdev_notify(sd, notification, arg) \
>> - ((!(sd) || !(sd)->v4l2_dev || !(sd)->v4l2_dev->notify) ? -ENODEV : \
>> - (sd)->v4l2_dev->notify((sd), (notification), (arg)))
>> +#define v4l2_subdev_notify(sd, notification, arg)
>> \
>> + do {
>> \
>> + if ((sd) && (sd)->v4l2_dev && (sd)->v4l2_dev->notify)
>> \
>> + (sd)->v4l2_dev->notify((sd), (notification), (arg));
>> \
>> + } while (0)
>
> The construct would prevent using v4l2_subdev_notify() as an expression. What
> about turning the macro into an inline function instead ?
How can you use a void function in an expression anyway? That was the whole
point
of the sparse error.
Regards,
Hans
>
>> #define v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, o, f) \
>> ((sd)->ops->o && (sd)->ops->o->f)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
