On 09/24/2012 03:23 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:08:17 +0300
Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi> escreveu:

On 09/24/2012 02:17 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:23:48 +0300
Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi> escreveu:

Use .get_if_frequency() as all used tuner drivers
(mt2060/qt1010/mxl5005s) supports it.

Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi>

@@ -240,26 +237,6 @@ static int rtl2830_init(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
        if (ret)
                goto err;

-       num = priv->cfg.if_dvbt % priv->cfg.xtal;
-       num *= 0x400000;
-       num = div_u64(num, priv->cfg.xtal);
-       num = -num;
-       if_ctl = num & 0x3fffff;
-       dev_dbg(&priv->i2c->dev, "%s: if_ctl=%08x\n", __func__, if_ctl);
-
-       ret = rtl2830_rd_reg_mask(priv, 0x119, &tmp, 0xc0); /* b[7:6] */
-       if (ret)
-               goto err;
-
-       buf[0] = tmp << 6;
-       buf[0] |= (if_ctl >> 16) & 0x3f;
-       buf[1] = (if_ctl >>  8) & 0xff;
-       buf[2] = (if_ctl >>  0) & 0xff;

Patch applied, but there was a context difference above:

   --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2830.c
   +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2830.c
   @@ -182,9 +182,6 @@ static int rtl2830_init(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
@@ -28,7 +50,7 @@ index eca1d72..3954760 100644
   -            goto err;
   -
   -    buf[0] = tmp << 6;
--      buf[0] = (if_ctl >> 16) & 0x3f;
+-      buf[0] |= (if_ctl >> 16) & 0x3f;
   -    buf[1] = (if_ctl >>  8) & 0xff;
   -    buf[2] = (if_ctl >>  0) & 0xff;
   -

(that's the diff between the patch applied and your original one)

Because of that:

http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/14066/

That's why I ask driver maintainers to send me pull requests, instead of
sending long series of patches at the mailing list, and tagging the patches
for review at ML as RFC: it is not warranted that the patches will be merged
at the order they're sent to the mailing list.

Do you mean I start again review & pick those patches myself from the mailing list and pull-request then from git tree? It is fine for me.

How about my own patches for my own drivers. Should I sent those to the mailing list and then pull-request via git? If yes, is there some tag which could be used to inform that this patch will be pull-requested via git tree?

regards
Antti

--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to