On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:

> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:56:11PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > @@ -2099,6 +2103,15 @@ struct v4l2_dbg_chip_ident {
> >     __u32 revision;    /* chip revision, chip specific */
> >  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> >  
> > +/* VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS */
> > +struct v4l2_create_buffers {
> > +   __u32                   index;          /* output: buffers 
> > index...index + count - 1 have been created */
> > +   __u32                   count;
> > +   enum v4l2_memory        memory;
> > +   struct v4l2_format      format;         /* "type" is used always, the 
> > rest if sizeimage == 0 */
> > +   __u32                   reserved[8];
> > +};
> 
> What about the kerneldoc comments you wrote right after v6 on 1st September
> for v4l2_create_buffers and the same for the compat32 version?

Looks like someone is trying very hard to cause me a heart failure;-) They 
are in a separate patch:

http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/338/

and let's leave it that way.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to