On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:55:39PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:45:48 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 13:07:42 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I remember being in a discussion a while ago regarding the requirement
> > > > of
> > > > having all the controls belonging to the same class in
> > > > VIDIOC_{TRY,S,G}_EXT_CTRLS. The answer I remember was that there was a
> > > > historical reason for this and it no longer exists.
> > >
> > > The original rule was that all controls have to belong to the same class.
> > > This was
> > > done to simplify drivers. Drivers that use the control framework can
> > > handle a class
> > > of 0, which means that the controls can be of any class.
> > >
> > > But we still have drivers that implement S_EXT_CTRLS but do not use the
> > > control
> > > framework, and for those this restriction is still valid. Usually such
> > > drivers will only
> > > handle MPEG class controls through that API.
> > >
> > > So I don't think this restriction can be lifted as long as there are
> > > drivers that do not
> > > use the control framework.
> >
> > All the drivers which implement *_EXT_CTRLS and check for ctrl_class do the
> > check for a single class. All the references for ctrl_class in individual
> > drivers (which actually were only checks that the user has set the field
> > correctly) are removed by the patch I posted.
> >
> > So I don't see a reason why we couldn't just say "please set this to zero
> > from now on".
> >
> >
>
> From what I remember (and I may be wrong by now) the drivers that implement
> S_EXT_CTRLS
> by themselves typically only support ext_ctrls for controls of a specific
> class (MPEG usually).
That's what I also found out.
> Dropping the check means that: 1) applications may think they can use any
> control when they can't for a certain group of drivers, and 2)
Why? This doesn't change how VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL works. Or am I missing
something?
> applications can no longer detect up front whether a driver supports
> mixing of control classes or not.
I think we shouldn't accept new drivers which don't use the control
framework. The existing drivers only implement controls in a single class,
or ignore the ctrl_class field. The patch I sent removes the check which I
see has only been there to comply with the spec.
> The way you can do 2) is by setting the control class to 0 and calling
> G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS with
> 0 controls.
>
> Once everything is converted I don't mind dropping this check, but until then
> I believe it should
> stay.
The patch does everything that is required for this as far as I see.
--
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi jabber/XMPP/Gmail: sai...@retiisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
