On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Richard Zidlicky <r...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:43:09AM +0100, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote: > >> status C Y | signal 66% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | >> status SC YL | signal 65% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 65% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 65% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 64% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 65% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 65% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 65% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK >> status SC YL | signal 64% | snr 0% | ber 2097151 | unc 0 | FE_HAS_LOCK > > the ber is very strange. It should be 0 or very close.
What are the ber and the unc? And does the 0% snr make sense? Why the % scale for that? > Did you try kaffeine or w_scan? I did try both of those. kaffeine I haven't been able to get to work at all and w_scan found the frequency but not the channels, much like scan. I'll try those again. There was something that happened for only a brief moment that allowed the scan to work but after a reboot it went back to the same. What could be missing from the frontend/demux config? Pedro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
