This is not how ACPI tables are written. Add a deprecation note and refer
to the proper documentation.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
index 27827842dffd..014b3f11e1ba 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
@@ -828,7 +828,10 @@ static int v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse(struct device *dev,
* underneath the fwnode identified by the previous tuple, etc. until you
* reached the fwnode you need.
*
- * An example with a graph, as defined in Documentation/acpi/dsd/graph.txt:
+ * THIS EXAMPLE EXISTS MERELY TO DOCUMENT THIS FUNCTION. DO NOT USE IT AS A
+ * REFERENCE IN HOW ACPI TABLES SHOULD BE WRITTEN!! See documentation under
+ * Documentation/acpi/dsd instead and especially graph.txt,
+ * data-node-references.txt and leds.txt .
*
* Scope (\_SB.PCI0.I2C2)
* {
--
2.11.0
