On 11/12/2018 08:07 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:56 PM Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>
>> As was discussed here (among other places):
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440
>>
>> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is
>> not a good idea. A better idea is to use 'cookies' (a better name is
>> welcome!)
>
> Maybe "tag" is more common for that kind of usage, but "cookie" is
> fine as well IMHO.
'tag' is MUCH better than cookie. I'll rename and thank you for this
excellent suggestion. That's really what we do: tagging buffers.
Regards,
Hans
>
> I can only comment on patches 1-4, but so far it seems to me that this
> would work. I will use this to base the next stateless codec API RFC.
>
> Thanks!
> Alex.
>
