> even when not used. I think it will also cause the compiler to emit warnings 
> for unused functions. I don't think that's a good idea.

Where is my brown paper bag? :/

> > But if you insist on drivers/i2c/i2c-sccb.c, then it should be a
> > seperate module, I'd think?
> 
> Given how small the functions are, I wouldn't request that, as it would 
> introduce another Kconfig symbol, but I'm not opposed to such a new module 
> either.

OK, let's keep it simple for now and introduce
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-sccb.c and link it into the core module. It can
still be factored out later if the need arises.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to