On 01/07/2018 05:54 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The ov9650 driver currently only supports legacy platform data probe.
> This change adds device tree probing.
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.m...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 130
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
> index 69433e1..99a3eab 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
> -static void __ov965x_set_power(struct ov965x *ov965x, int on)
> +static int __ov965x_set_power(struct ov965x *ov965x, int on)
> {
> if (on) {
> - ov965x_gpio_set(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN], 0);
> - ov965x_gpio_set(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST], 0);
> + int ret = clk_prepare_enable(ov965x->clk);
It seems you rely on the fact clk_prepare_enable() is a nop when passed
argument is NULL, which happens in non-DT case.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN], 0);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST], 0);
> msleep(25);
> } else {
> - ov965x_gpio_set(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST], 1);
> - ov965x_gpio_set(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN], 1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST], 1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN], 1);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(ov965x->clk);
> }
>
> ov965x->streaming = 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> @@ -1408,16 +1414,17 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops ov965x_subdev_ops
> = {
> /*
> * Reset and power down GPIOs configuration
> */
> -static int ov965x_configure_gpios(struct ov965x *ov965x,
> - const struct ov9650_platform_data *pdata)
> +static int ov965x_configure_gpios_pdata(struct ov965x *ov965x,
> + const struct ov9650_platform_data *pdata)
> {
> int ret, i;
> + int gpios[NUM_GPIOS];
>
> - ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN] = pdata->gpio_pwdn;
> - ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST] = pdata->gpio_reset;
> + gpios[GPIO_PWDN] = pdata->gpio_pwdn;
> + gpios[GPIO_RST] = pdata->gpio_reset;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ov965x->gpios); i++) {
> - int gpio = ov965x->gpios[i];
> + int gpio = gpios[i];
>
> if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
> continue;
> @@ -1427,9 +1434,30 @@ static int ov965x_configure_gpios(struct ov965x
> *ov965x,
> return ret;
> v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "set gpio %d to 1\n", gpio);
>
> - gpio_set_value(gpio, 1);
> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 1);
> gpio_export(gpio, 0);
> - ov965x->gpios[i] = gpio;
> + ov965x->gpios[i] = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ov965x_configure_gpios(struct ov965x *ov965x)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &ov965x->client->dev;
> +
> + ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN] = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "powerdown",
> + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN])) {
> + dev_info(dev, "can't get %s GPIO\n", "powerdown");
> + return PTR_ERR(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_PWDN]);
> + }
> +
> + ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST] = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset",
> + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST])) {
> + dev_info(dev, "can't get %s GPIO\n", "reset");
> + return PTR_ERR(ov965x->gpios[GPIO_RST]);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1443,7 +1471,10 @@ static int ov965x_detect_sensor(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&ov965x->lock);
> - __ov965x_set_power(ov965x, 1);
> + ret = __ov965x_set_power(ov965x, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> msleep(25);
>
> /* Check sensor revision */
> @@ -1463,6 +1494,7 @@ static int ov965x_detect_sensor(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> ret = -ENODEV;
> }
> }
> +out:
> mutex_unlock(&ov965x->lock);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1476,23 +1508,39 @@ static int ov965x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> struct ov965x *ov965x;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!pdata) {
> - dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data not specified\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - if (pdata->mclk_frequency == 0) {
> - dev_err(&client->dev, "MCLK frequency not specified\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> ov965x = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ov965x), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ov965x)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - mutex_init(&ov965x->lock);
I would leave mutex initialization as first thing after the private data
structure allocation, is there a need to move it further?
> ov965x->client = client;
> - ov965x->mclk_frequency = pdata->mclk_frequency;
> +
> + if (pdata) {
> + if (pdata->mclk_frequency == 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "MCLK frequency not specified\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + ov965x->mclk_frequency = pdata->mclk_frequency;
> +
> + ret = ov965x_configure_gpios_pdata(ov965x, pdata);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + } else if (dev_fwnode(&client->dev)) {
> + ov965x->clk = devm_clk_get(&ov965x->client->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(ov965x->clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(ov965x->clk);
> + ov965x->mclk_frequency = clk_get_rate(ov965x->clk);
> +
> + ret = ov965x_configure_gpios(ov965x);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&client->dev,
> + "Neither platform data nor device property
> specified\n");
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_init(&ov965x->lock);
>
> sd = &ov965x->sd;
> v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(sd, client, &ov965x_subdev_ops);
> @@ -1502,10 +1550,6 @@ static int ov965x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> sd->flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE |
> V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;
>
> - ret = ov965x_configure_gpios(ov965x, pdata);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto err_mutex;
> -
> ov965x->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> sd->entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR;
> ret = media_entity_pads_init(&sd->entity, 1, &ov965x->pad);
> @@ -1561,9 +1605,19 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ov965x_id[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ov965x_id);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
Is there any advantage in using IS_ENABLED() rather than just
#ifdef CONFIG_OF ? of_match_ptr() is defined with just #idef CONFIG_OF/
#else/#endif. I would use simply #ifdef CONFIG_OF here.
Otherwise looks good.
Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawro...@samsung.com>
--
Regards,
Sylwester
