On 2017/12/19 18:43, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
Hi,


On 16/12/17 12:54, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
The driver may sleep under a spinlock.
The function call path is:
bdisp_device_run (acquire the spinlock)
    bdisp_hw_reset
      msleep --> may sleep

To fix it, readl_poll_timeout_atomic is used to replace msleep.

This bug is found by my static analysis tool(DSAC) and
checked by my code review.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com>
---
   drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c |   16 ++++++++--------
   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
index b7892f3..e94a371 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
    */
#include <linux/delay.h>
This delay.h include is no more needed, remove it.

+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include "bdisp.h"
   #include "bdisp-filter.h"
@@ -366,7 +367,7 @@ struct bdisp_filter_addr {
    */
   int bdisp_hw_reset(struct bdisp_dev *bdisp)
   {
-       unsigned int i;
+       u32 tmp;
dev_dbg(bdisp->dev, "%s\n", __func__); @@ -379,15 +380,14 @@ int bdisp_hw_reset(struct bdisp_dev *bdisp)
        writel(0, bdisp->regs + BLT_CTL);
/* Wait for reset done */
-       for (i = 0; i < POLL_RST_MAX; i++) {
-               if (readl(bdisp->regs + BLT_STA1) & BLT_STA1_IDLE)
-                       break;
-               msleep(POLL_RST_DELAY_MS);
-       }
-       if (i == POLL_RST_MAX)
As recommended by Mauro, please add this comment:
Despite the large timeout, most of the time the reset happens without
needing any delays

+       if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(bdisp->regs + BLT_STA1, tmp,
+               (tmp & BLT_STA1_IDLE), POLL_RST_DELAY_MS,
+                       POLL_RST_DELAY_MS * POLL_RST_MAX)) {
read_poll_timeout expects US timings, not MS.

                dev_err(bdisp->dev, "Reset timeout\n");
+               return -EAGAIN;
+       }
- return (i == POLL_RST_MAX) ? -EAGAIN : 0;
+       return 0;
   }
/**

Hi,

Okay, I have submitted a new patch according to your advice :)


Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai

Reply via email to