On 10/10/2017 02:57 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:45:25PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 04/10/17 23:50, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> The notifier complete callback may return an error. This error code was
>>> simply returned to the caller but never handled properly.
>>>
>>> Move calling the complete callback function to the caller from
>>> v4l2_async_test_notify and undo the work that was done either in async
>>> sub-device or async notifier registration.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 78
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
>>> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
>>> index ca281438a0ae..4924481451ca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
>>> @@ -122,9 +122,6 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct
>>> v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>>> /* Move from the global subdevice list to notifier's done */
>>> list_move(&sd->async_list, ¬ifier->done);
>>>
>>> - if (list_empty(¬ifier->waiting) && notifier->complete)
>>> - return notifier->complete(notifier);
>>> -
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -136,11 +133,27 @@ static void v4l2_async_cleanup(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>>> sd->asd = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void v4l2_async_notifier_unbind_all_subdevs(
>>> + struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>>> +{
>>> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp;
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, ¬ifier->done, async_list) {
>>> + if (notifier->unbind)
>>> + notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, sd->asd);
>>> +
>>> + v4l2_async_cleanup(sd);
>>> +
>>> + list_move(&sd->async_list, &subdev_list);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>>> struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>>> {
>>> struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp;
>>> struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
>>> + int ret;
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> if (!v4l2_dev || !notifier->num_subdevs ||
>>> @@ -185,19 +198,30 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_device
>>> *v4l2_dev,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (list_empty(¬ifier->waiting) && notifier->complete) {
>>> + ret = notifier->complete(notifier);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto err_complete;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> /* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
>>> list_add(¬ifier->list, ¬ifier_list);
>>>
>>> mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_complete:
>>> + v4l2_async_notifier_unbind_all_subdevs(notifier);
>>> +
>>> + mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_notifier_register);
>>>
>>> void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>>> {
>>> - struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp;
>>> -
>>> if (!notifier->v4l2_dev)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> @@ -205,14 +229,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct
>>> v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>>>
>>> list_del(¬ifier->list);
>>>
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, ¬ifier->done, async_list) {
>>> - if (notifier->unbind)
>>> - notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, sd->asd);
>>> -
>>> - v4l2_async_cleanup(sd);
>>> -
>>> - list_move(&sd->async_list, &subdev_list);
>>> - }
>>> + v4l2_async_notifier_unbind_all_subdevs(notifier);
>>>
>>> mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>>>
>>> @@ -223,6 +240,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_async_notifier_unregister);
>>> int v4l2_async_register_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>>> {
>>> struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier;
>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * No reference taken. The reference is held by the device
>>> @@ -238,19 +256,43 @@ int v4l2_async_register_subdev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>>>
>>> list_for_each_entry(notifier, ¬ifier_list, list) {
>>> struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd = v4l2_async_belongs(notifier,
>>> sd);
>>> - if (asd) {
>>> - int ret = v4l2_async_test_notify(notifier, sd, asd);
>>> - mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (!asd)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + ret = v4l2_async_test_notify(notifier, sd, asd);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto err_unlock;
>>> +
>>> + if (!list_empty(¬ifier->waiting) || !notifier->complete)
>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>> +
>>> + ret = notifier->complete(notifier);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto err_cleanup;
>>> +
>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* None matched, wait for hot-plugging */
>>> list_add(&sd->async_list, &subdev_list);
>>>
>>> +out_unlock:
>>> mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_cleanup:
>>> + if (notifier->unbind)
>>> + notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, sd->asd);
>>> +
>>> + v4l2_async_cleanup(sd);
>>
>> I'm trying to understand this. Who will unbind all subdevs in this case?
>
> The driver that registered them is responsible for that, as usual.
>
>>
>> And in the general case: if complete returns an error, the bridge driver
>> should be remove()d. Who will do that? Does that work at all?
>
> The bridge driver can't do that alone, the bridge driver would need to be
> unbound explicitly by the user.
>
> This approach has the benefit that it's symmetric: on error we only tear
> down the part that was added, no more. Doing otherwise would likely make
> the error handling hard to understand and test properly. For instance, if a
> driver's probe function calling v4l2_async_register_subdev() or
> v4l2_async_notifier_register() fails, leading the driver binding to fail.
> If the error is temporary for whatever reason, just retrying the operation
> will help.
>
So to be clear: if complete() returns an error, then you basically end up with
a 'zombie' device: it's been successfully probed, but because complete() failed
it will just sit there until the user unbinds it (typically via rmmod).
For the record: this will only happen if the subdev is loaded after the main
driver. If the subdev is loaded before the main driver, then when the main
driver
calls v4l2_async_notifier_register() from the probe() function it will return an
error and the probe will fail with an error.
Do I understand this correctly?
Regards,
Hans
