Rob Herring <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 07:52:44AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif-capture.txt | 65
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt | 8 +++
>> 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif-capture.txt
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif-capture.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif-capture.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..c447ac482c1d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif-capture.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
>> +Texas Instruments VPIF Capture
>> +------------------------------
>> +
>> +The TI Video Port InterFace (VPIF) capture component is the primary
>> +component for video capture on the DA850 family of TI DaVinci SoCs.
>> +
>> +TI Document number reference: SPRUH82C
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: must be "ti,da850-vpif-capture"
>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers set for the device;
>> +- interrupts: should contain IRQ line for the VPIF
>> +
>> +VPIF capture has a 16-bit parallel bus input, supporting 2 8-bit
>> +channels or a single 16-bit channel. It should contain at least one
>> +port child node with child 'endpoint' node. Please refer to the
>> +bindings defined in
>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt.
>> +
>> +Example using 2 8-bit input channels, one of which is connected to an
>> +I2C-connected TVP5147 decoder:
>> +
>> + vpif_capture: video-capture@0x00217000 {
>
> Drop the 0x00.
>
>> + compatible = "ti,da850-vpif-capture";
>> + reg = <0x00217000 0x1000>;
>> + interrupts = <92>;
>> +
>> + port {
>> + vpif_ch0: endpoint@0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>
> This is missing #size-cells and #addr-cells.
>
Yup.
>> + bus-width = <8>;
>> + remote-endpoint = <&composite>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vpif_ch1: endpoint@1 {
>
> I think probably channels here should be ports rather than endpoints.
> AIUI, having multiple endpoints is for cases like a mux or 1 to many
> connections. There's only one data flow, but multiple sources or sinks.
OK.
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + bus-width = <8>;
>> + data-shift = <8>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> +[ ... ]
>> +
>> +&i2c0 {
>> +
>> + tvp5147@5d {
>> + compatible = "ti,tvp5147";
>> + reg = <0x5d>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + port {
>> + composite: endpoint {
>> + hsync-active = <1>;
>> + vsync-active = <1>;
>> + pclk-sample = <0>;
>> +
>> + /* VPIF channel 0 (lower 8-bits) */
>> + remote-endpoint = <&vpif_ch0>;
>> + bus-width = <8>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> +};
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d004e600aabe
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +Texas Instruments VPIF
>> +----------------------
>> +
>> +The Video Port InterFace (VPIF) is the core component for video output
>> +and capture on DA850 TI Davinci SoCs.
>> +
>> +- compatible: must be "ti,da850-vpif"
>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the registers set for the device;
>
> That's it? How does this block relate to the capture block?
I separated them because the current legacy drivers are separated into 3
different platform drivers.
However, after some discussions with Laurent, I'm going to just create a
single VPIF node with input (capture) and output (display) ports, and
then have to tweak the existing drivers a bit more than I had wanted to.
IOW, I was lazy.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
