Le 12/08/2016 à 15:17, Hans Verkuil a écrit : > On 08/04/2016 05:39 PM, Charles-Antoine Couret wrote: > > A commit log is missing here.
Yeah I will fix that. >> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst >> b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst >> index f7bf21f..0205bf6 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst >> @@ -339,6 +339,14 @@ EBUSY >> >> - The timings follow the VESA Generalized Timings Formula standard >> >> + - .. row 7 >> + >> + - ``V4L2_DV_BT_STD_SDI`` >> + >> + - The timings follow the SDI Timings standard. >> + There are not always horizontal syncs/porches or similar in this >> format. >> + If it is not precised by standard, blanking timings must be set in >> + hsync or vsync fields by default. > > OK. This is confusing. The text was changed after my question about something > porch-like > in the SMPTE-125M standard. But I see nothing like that after re-reading it. > > So what sort of 'porch' timing were you thinking of? In SMPTE-125M for example, the time between the real horizontal blanking is precised (16 pixelclock). For me it looks like front porch timing. > I wonder if I shouldn't just use the text from your first patch: > > - ``V4L2_DV_BT_STD_SDI`` > > - The timings follow the SDI Timings standard. > There are no horizontal syncs/porches at all in this format. > Total blanking timings must be set in hsync or vsync fields only. I agree with that if you prefer, after all the front/backporch are probably irrelevant in this case. So, if you confirm this way, I would send you another patchset to fix that. Thank you. Regards, Charles-Antoine Couret -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
