On 08/01/2016 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Monday 01 Aug 2016 10:56:21 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 08/01/2016 10:34 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Monday 01 Aug 2016 09:54:25 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>> From: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> The sh_mobile_csi2 isn't used anymore (was it ever?), so remove it.
>>>> Especially since the soc-camera framework is being deprecated.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/Kconfig | 7 -
>>>> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/Makefile | 1 -
>>>> .../platform/soc_camera/sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c | 229 +-----------
>>>> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/sh_mobile_csi2.c | 400 -------------
>>>> include/media/drv-intf/sh_mobile_ceu.h | 1 -
>>>> include/media/drv-intf/sh_mobile_csi2.h | 48 ---
>>>> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 676 deletions(-)
>>>> delete mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/sh_mobile_csi2.c
>>>> delete mode 100644 include/media/drv-intf/sh_mobile_c
>>>
>>> Any plan for the sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver by the way ?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> The idea is to replace the remaining soc-camera drivers by 'proper' drivers
>> (Robert Jarzmik is working on that for the pxa_camera driver, and I am
>> working on the atmel-isi driver).
>>
>> Once that's done the only soc-camera driver left is the sh_mobile_ceu_camera
>> driver.
>>
>> At that moment the soc-camera framework will be folded into the
>> sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver and it will cease to exist as a framework. It's
>> just a very complex driver. I plan on refactoring it further, removing dead
>> code etc.
>>
>> My original plan was to replace the sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver by a
>> 'proper' driver as well, but it was next to impossible to do that. The fact
>> that it didn't use the device tree and the complexity with scaling and
>> cropping and the close dependency on soc-camera just made this a no go (at
>> least not something I was willing to spend more time on).
>>
>> I think this alternative approach has the best chance of succeeding.
>
> Are there really users of the CEU driver ? There are a few ARM-based Renesas
> platforms that include the CEU, but they're pretty old now and don't support
> the CEU in mainline. As far as I know only arch/sh still makes use of the CEU
> driver.
Well, I can still test it. And it is still in the arch/sh code. It's not really
my decision since I just don't know enough whether or not it can be removed.
You are probably better placed to figure that out.
>> I'm not sure yet what we'll do with the soc-camera sensors. I experimented
>> a bit with extracting them from soc-camera, but for most it's not easy to
>> do so. Something to look at later.
>
> It would be a shame to remove them all, but it also depends on whether we can
> find hardware for testing.
Well, they always remain in git, but I know what you mean. Anyway, that's for
later.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
