On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:30:03AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:37:34 +0000
> iceberg <str...@ispras.ru> wrote:
> 
> > In ./drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c, in function cafe_pci_probe: 
> > Mutex must be unlocked before exit
> >     1. On paths starting with mutex lock in line 1912, then continuing in 
> > lines: 
> > 1929, 1936 (goto unreg) and 1940 (goto iounmap) . 
> >     2. On path starting in line 1971 mutex lock, and then continuing in 
> > line 1978 
> > (goto out_smbus) mutex.
> 
> That's a definite bug, but I hate all those unlocks in the error
> branches.  As it happens, we don't really need the mutex until the
> device has been exposed to the rest of the kernel, so I propose the
> following as a better patch.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out,

Actually, for something like this, I would put the mutex_unlock in the error 
path,
and just add a local variable to tell that it is locked.

        int is_locked = 0;

[...]

        mutex_lock(&cam->s_mutex);
        is_locked = 1;

[...]

        mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex);
        is_locked = 0;

[...]

out_iounmap:
        pci_iounmap(pdev, cam->regs);
        if (is_locked)
                mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex);
out_free:

[...]

Or something similar. I hate the multiple unlocks too.

-- Steve

> 
> jon
> 
> ---
> Fix a mutex leak
> 
> Certain error exits from cafe_pci_probe() can leave the camera mutex
> locked.  For much of the time, we didn't need the mutex anyway; take it out
> and add an unlock in the path where it is needed.
> 
> Reported-by: Alexander Strakh <str...@ispras.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net>
> ---
>  drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> index c4d181d..0f62b5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> @@ -1909,7 +1909,6 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>               goto out_free;
>  
>       mutex_init(&cam->s_mutex);
> -     mutex_lock(&cam->s_mutex);
>       spin_lock_init(&cam->dev_lock);
>       cam->state = S_NOTREADY;
>       cafe_set_config_needed(cam, 1);
> @@ -1949,7 +1948,6 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>        * because the sensor could attach in this call chain, leading to
>        * unsightly deadlocks.
>        */
> -     mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex);  /* attach can deadlock */
>       ret = cafe_smbus_setup(cam);
>       if (ret)
>               goto out_freeirq;
> @@ -1991,6 +1989,7 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>       return 0;
>  
>  out_smbus:
> +     mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex);
>       cafe_smbus_shutdown(cam);
>  out_freeirq:
>       cafe_ctlr_power_down(cam);
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to