Hello Guennadi,
So let's assume that camera interface device can process
V4L2_CID_SHARPNESS and even external camera device can process that,
then according to your patch both of camera interface and external
camera device can be issued to process V4L2_CID_SHARPNESS which I
guess will make image sharpened twice. Am I getting the patch right?
If I'm getting right, it might be better to give user make a choice
through platform data or some sort of variable which can make a choice
between camera interface and camera device to process the CID. It
could be just in aspect of manufacturer mind, we do love to make a
choice between same features in different devices in easy way. So
never mind if my idea is not helpful making your driver elegant :-)
Cheers,
Nate
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Guennadi
Liakhovetski<g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Dongsoo, Nathaniel Kim wrote:
>
>> Hello Guennadi,
>>
>> It's a very interesting patch. Actually some camera interfaces support
>> for various image effects and I was wondering how to use them in SoC
>> camera subsystem.
>>
>> But here is a question. Is it possible to make a choice with the same
>> CID between icd and ici? I mean, if both of camera interface and
>> camera device are supporting for same CID how can user select any of
>> them to use? Sometimes, some image effects supported by camera
>> interface are not good so I want to use the same effect supported by
>> external camera ISP device.
>>
>> I think, it might be possible but I can't see how.
>
>> > @@ -681,9 +698,16 @@ static int soc_camera_s_ctrl(struct file *file, void
>> > *priv,
>> > struct soc_camera_file *icf = file->private_data;
>> > struct soc_camera_device *icd = icf->icd;
>> > struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
>> > + int ret;
>> >
>> > WARN_ON(priv != file->private_data);
>> >
>> > + if (ici->ops->set_ctrl) {
>> > + ret = ici->ops->set_ctrl(icd, ctrl);
>> > + if (ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
>> > + return ret;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > return v4l2_device_call_until_err(&ici->v4l2_dev, (__u32)icd, core,
>> > s_ctrl, ctrl);
>> > }
>
> Should be easy to see in the patch. Host's s_ctrl is called first. It can
> return -ENOIOCTLCMD then sensor's control will be called too. Ot the host
> may choose to call sensor's control itself, which, however, is
> discouraged.
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
> http://www.open-technology.de/
>
--
=
DongSoo, Nathaniel Kim
Engineer
Mobile S/W Platform Lab.
Digital Media & Communications R&D Centre
Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.
e-mail : dongsoo....@gmail.com
dongsoo45....@samsung.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
