On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:21:55 -0600 (CST) kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
> I should add to the above that now I have tested, and indeed this > change does not solve the problem of kernel oops after disconnect > while streaming. It does make one change. The xterm does not go wild > with error messages. But it is still not possible to close the svv > window. Moreover, ps ax reveals that [svv] is running as an > unkillable process, with [sq905/0] and [sq905/1], equally unkillable, > in supporting roles. And dmesg reveals an oops. The problem is after > all notorious by now, so I do not see much need for yet another log > of debug output unless specifically asked for such. Why is there 2 sq905 processes? What is the oops? (Your last trace was good, because it gave the last gspca/sq905 messages and the full oops) > Perhaps we also need to do what Adam suggested yesterday, and add a > call to destroy_urbs() in gspca_disconnect()? Surely not! The destroy_urbs() must be called at the right time, i.e. on close(). -- Ken ar c'hentan | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
