verif_scale_pyperf600 loads pyperf600.bpf.o, a large scale case produced
by partial LLVM unrolling.

On some kernel/toolchain combinations, the verifier rejects it with -E2BIG:

  The sequence of 8193 jumps is too complex.

This hits the verifier jump sequence complexity limit (8192).

Treat -E2BIG for this test as SKIP rather than FAIL. Other pyperf600
variants are unaffected.

Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <[email protected]>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c          | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
index 73f669014b69..181acdddea1c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
@@ -112,13 +112,33 @@ void test_verif_scale_pyperf180()
 
 void test_verif_scale_pyperf600()
 {
+       libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_fn = NULL;
+       int err;
+
        /* partial unroll. llvm will unroll loop ~150 times.
         * C loop count -> 600.
         * Asm loop count -> 4.
         * 16k insns in loop body.
         * Total of 5 such loops. Total program size ~82k insns.
         */
-       scale_test("pyperf600.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false);
+
+       if (env.verifier_stats) {
+               test__force_log();
+               old_print_fn = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_debug_print);
+       }
+
+       err = check_load("pyperf600.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT);
+
+       if (env.verifier_stats)
+               libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn);
+
+       if (err == -E2BIG) {
+               test__skip();
+               return;
+       }
+
+       ASSERT_OK(err, "expect_success");
+
 }
 
 void test_verif_scale_pyperf600_bpf_loop(void)

base-commit: 11439c4635edd669ae435eec308f4ab8a0804808
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to