On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:30:56AM +0530, Manali Shukla wrote: > Do you have concern with the decision to expose the flag to /proc/cpuinfo? > > The decision to expose the flag to /proc/cpuinfo was already discussed in > [v1]. As suggested in the discussion [v1], I have added "buslock" to be > enumerated in /proc/cpuinfo.
If you mean this: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/[email protected]/T/#m1dc7e08c54dd91d53a6bc5b1ed0a6721b356a756 I don't see any conclusion there. I see Sean wanting to export information out of KVM to say what it supports without adding user ABI and I don't know how far that has come but what you're doing here ain't it. Just do: #define X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_THRESHOLD (15*32+29) /* Bus lock threshold */ and then later KVM can export this however it prefers. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
