On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:30:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:25:46PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:10:59PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > - (ret & PR_MTE_TCF_MASK), mask); > > > > + (int)(ret & PR_MTE_TCF_MASK), mask); > > > > Shouldn't we just use a %lx here? Casts tend to be suspicious... > > > It's more like the ret is actually 32-bit and should stay like that when > > bits are masked out. But the bitwise op 'upgrades' it to a long (in > > hindsight, we should not have used UL for the TCF bits and mask). > > Hrm, right. Possibly put the cast on PR_MTE_TCF_MASK rather than on the > expression as a whole then?
Can do. -- Catalin
