Hi! > Just saying "LTP" is not granular enough. LTP has hundreds of individual > test programs, and it would be useful to specify the individual tests > from LTP that should be run per sub-system.
A few thousand tests to be more precise, and also the content tend to change between releases, be it test additions or removal and I do not think this level of changes is somehing that makes sense to be tracked in such database. It may be better to have more generic description of LTP subsets, there are a few obvious e.g. "SysV IPC" or "Timers", and have the LTP testrunner map that to actual testcases. The hard task here is to figure out which groups would be useful and keep the set reasonably small. I can move this forward in LTP reasonably quickly we get small list of useful groups from kernel develpers. -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz
