On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:48:51AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> > A "%s" is missing in ksft_exit_fail_msg(); instead, use the newly
> > introduced ksft_exit_fail_perror(). Also, uint64_t corresponds to
> > unsigned 64-bit integer, so use %lx instead of %llx.

> What's wrong with using %llx for a uint64_t? I think that part of the
> code is fine as-is.

IIRC there's some printf format specifiers specific to uint64_t which
are probably a better choice here.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to