Andrew, please squash this small patch with this one. It directly addresses
a problem found in review.
(I was told this is the preferred way to send small fixups, and I don't
think anyone wants a v4 over this trivial issue)
Thank you!
----8<----
>From 614e5dc27073c39579c863ebdff4396948e28e03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falc...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:20:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Fix mseal's length
We accidentally msealed too much, which could overrun and try to mseal
other regions. This seems to be harmless (at least on top-down
architectures) due to various reasons all aligning, but may very well
cause spurious test failures to e.g bottom-up mmap architectures.
Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falc...@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
index 0d4d40fb0f88..0c41513219ae 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static void test_seal_mprotect_partial_mprotect_tail(bool
seal)
FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
if (seal) {
- ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, size);
+ ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, page_size);
FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
}
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static void test_seal_munmap_partial_across_vmas(bool
seal)
FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
if (seal) {
- ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, size);
+ ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, page_size);
FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
}
--
2.46.0
