On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 07:18 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote: > On 8/6/24 14:01, Jakub Sitnicki wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:01 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote: >>> Series takes care of few bugs and missing features with the aim to improve >>> the test coverage of sockmap/sockhash. >>> >>> Last patch is a create_pair() rewrite making use of >>> __attribute__((cleanup)) to handle socket fd lifetime. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <m...@rbox.co> >>> --- >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Rebase on bpf-next (Jakub) >>> - Use cleanup helpers from kernel's cleanup.h (Jakub) >>> - Fix subject of patch 3, rephrase patch 4, use correct prefix >>> - Link to v1: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724-sockmap-selftest-fixes-v1-0-46165d224...@rbox.co >>> >>> Changes in v1: >>> - No declarations in function body (Jakub) >>> - Don't touch output arguments until function succeeds (Jakub) >>> - Link to v0: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/027fdb41-ee11-4be0-a493-22f28a1ab...@rbox.co/ >>> >>> --- >>> Michal Luczaj (6): >>> selftests/bpf: Support more socket types in create_pair() >>> selftests/bpf: Socket pair creation, cleanups >>> selftests/bpf: Simplify inet_socketpair() and >>> vsock_socketpair_connectible() >>> selftests/bpf: Honour the sotype of af_unix redir tests >>> selftests/bpf: Exercise SOCK_STREAM unix_inet_redir_to_connected() >>> selftests/bpf: Introduce __attribute__((cleanup)) in create_pair() >>> >>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 28 ++-- >>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_helpers.h | 149 >>> ++++++++++++++------- >>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c | 117 ++-------------- >>> 3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-) >>> --- >>> base-commit: 92cc2456e9775dc4333fb4aa430763ae4ac2f2d9 >>> change-id: 20240729-selftest-sockmap-fixes-bcca996e143b >>> >>> Best regards, >> >> Thanks again for these fixes. For the series: >> >> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <ja...@cloudflare.com> >> Tested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <ja...@cloudflare.com> > > Great, thanks for the review. With this completed, I guess we can unwind > the (mail) stack to [1]. Is that ingress-to-local et al. something you > wanted to take care of yourself or can I give it a try?
I haven't stated any work on. You're welcome to tackle that. All I have is a toy test that I've used to generate the redirect matrix. Perhaps it can serve as inspiration: https://github.com/jsitnicki/sockmap-redir-matrix > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87msmqn9ws....@cloudflare.com/ > > Also, I've noticed patchwork still lists (besides this one) the old version > of this series. Am I supposed to tell the bot to disregard it? Only the maintainers can change patch set status in patchwork: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status
