On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There are a couple of spelling mistakes in ksft_test_result_fail messages.
> Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
> index 1dd94197da30..6838c561e4c9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
> @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ int main(void)
>       ksft_print_msg("vl = %lu\n", vl);
>  
>       if (datap[0] != 0x00 && datap[0] != 0xff) {
> -             ksft_test_result_fail("v-regesters are not properly 
> initialized\n");
> +             ksft_test_result_fail("v-registers are not properly 
> initialized\n");
>               dump(datap, vl * 4);
>               exit(-1);
>       }
>  
>       for (i = 1; i < vl * 4; i++) {
>               if (datap[i] != datap[0]) {
> -                     ksft_test_result_fail("detect stale values on 
> v-regesters\n");
> +                     ksft_test_result_fail("detect stale values on 
> v-registers\n");
>                       dump(datap, vl * 4);
>                       exit(-2);
>               }
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

I fixed this and some incorrect error reporting in a different patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

- Charlie


Reply via email to