On 4/10/24 1:22 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> So, the struct adjtimex freq field takes a signed value who's
> units are in shifted (<<16) parts-per-million.
> 
> Unfortunately for negative adjustments, the straightforward use
> of:
>       freq = ppm<<16
> will trip undefined behavior warnings with clang:
> 
> valid-adjtimex.c:66:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined 
> [-Wshift-negative-value]
>         -499<<16,
>         ~~~~^
> valid-adjtimex.c:67:6: warning: shifting a negative signed value is undefined 
> [-Wshift-negative-value]
>         -450<<16,
>         ~~~~^
> ...
> 
> So fix our use of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex
> test case to use multiply by (1<<16) to avoid this.
> 
> The patch also aligns the values a bit to make it look nicer.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-ma...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nat...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <jones...@google.com>
> Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.an...@collabora.com>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Lee Jones <jones...@google.com>
> Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.an...@collabora.com>
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0c6d4f0d-2064-4444-986b-1d1ed7821...@collabora.com/
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstu...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.an...@collabora.com>

> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 69 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c
> index 48b9a803235a..9606d45767e7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c
> @@ -62,45 +62,46 @@ int clear_time_state(void)
>  #define NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE 4
>  #define NUM_FREQ_INVALID 2
>  
> +#define SHIFTED_PPM (1 << 16)
>  long valid_freq[NUM_FREQ_VALID] = {
> -     -499<<16,
> -     -450<<16,
> -     -400<<16,
> -     -350<<16,
> -     -300<<16,
> -     -250<<16,
> -     -200<<16,
> -     -150<<16,
> -     -100<<16,
> -     -75<<16,
> -     -50<<16,
> -     -25<<16,
> -     -10<<16,
> -     -5<<16,
> -     -1<<16,
> +      -499 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -450 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -400 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -350 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -300 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -250 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -200 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -150 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -100 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       -75 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       -50 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       -25 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       -10 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +        -5 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +        -1 * SHIFTED_PPM,
>       -1000,
> -     1<<16,
> -     5<<16,
> -     10<<16,
> -     25<<16,
> -     50<<16,
> -     75<<16,
> -     100<<16,
> -     150<<16,
> -     200<<16,
> -     250<<16,
> -     300<<16,
> -     350<<16,
> -     400<<16,
> -     450<<16,
> -     499<<16,
> +         1 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +         5 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +        10 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +        25 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +        50 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +        75 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       100 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       150 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       200 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       250 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       300 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       350 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       400 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       450 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       499 * SHIFTED_PPM,
>  };
>  
>  long outofrange_freq[NUM_FREQ_OUTOFRANGE] = {
> -     -1000<<16,
> -     -550<<16,
> -     550<<16,
> -     1000<<16,
> +     -1000 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      -550 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +       550 * SHIFTED_PPM,
> +      1000 * SHIFTED_PPM,
>  };
>  
>  #define LONG_MAX (~0UL>>1)

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum

Reply via email to