Dmitry, Thomas,

To simplify the review I've attached the code with this patch applied below.

Yes, this changes the "semantics" of check_timer_distribution(), perhaps it
should be renamed.

But I do not see a better approach, and in fact I think that

        Test that all running threads _eventually_ receive 
CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID

is the wrong goal.

Do you agree?

Oleg.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

static pthread_t ctd_thread;
static volatile int ctd_count, ctd_failed;

static void ctd_sighandler(int sig)
{
        if (pthread_self() != ctd_thread)
                ctd_failed = 1;
        ctd_count--;
}

static void *ctd_thread_func(void *arg)
{
        struct itimerspec val = {
                .it_value.tv_sec = 0,
                .it_value.tv_nsec = 1000 * 1000,
                .it_interval.tv_sec = 0,
                .it_interval.tv_nsec = 1000 * 1000,
        };
        timer_t id;

        /* 1/10 seconds to ensure the leader sleeps */
        usleep(10000);

        ctd_count = 100;
        if (timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id))
                return "Can't create timer";
        if (timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL))
                return "Can't set timer";

        while (ctd_count > 0 && !ctd_failed)
                ;

        if (timer_delete(id))
                return "Can't delete timer";

        return NULL;
}

/*
 * Test that only the running thread receives the timer signal.
 */
static int check_timer_distribution(void)
{
        const char *errmsg;

        signal(SIGALRM, ctd_sighandler);

        errmsg = "Can't create thread";
        if (pthread_create(&ctd_thread, NULL, ctd_thread_func, NULL))
                goto err;

        errmsg = "Can't join thread";
        if (pthread_join(ctd_thread, (void **)&errmsg) || errmsg)
                goto err;

        if (ctd_failed)
                ksft_test_result_skip("No signal distribution. Assuming old 
kernel\n");
        else
                ksft_test_result_pass("check signal distribution\n");

        return 0;
err:
        ksft_print_msg(errmsg);
        return -1;
}


Reply via email to