On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:39:07PM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> @@ -168,6 +180,42 @@ void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct
> vfio_device *vdev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas);
>
> +int vfio_iommufd_physical_pasid_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> + u32 pasid, u32 *pt_id)
> +{
> + void *entry;
> + int rc;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + entry = xa_load(&vdev->pasid_pts, pasid);
> + if (xa_is_value(entry))
> + rc = iommufd_device_pasid_replace(vdev->iommufd_device, pasid,
> pt_id);
> + else
> + rc = iommufd_device_pasid_attach(vdev->iommufd_device, pasid,
> pt_id);
An ida is a more approriate data structure if the only point is to
keep track if a pasid is in use or not..
Jason
