Xin Li <xin3...@intel.com> writes:

> Enable the secondary VM exit controls to prepare for nested FRED.
>
> Tested-by: Shan Kang <shan.k...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3...@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/nested-vmx.rst |  1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h        |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h           |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c                 | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c                 | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c                 |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h                 |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.h                        |  2 +-
>  8 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/nested-vmx.rst 
> b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/nested-vmx.rst
> index ac2095d41f02..e64ef231f310 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/nested-vmx.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/nested-vmx.rst
> @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ struct shadow_vmcs is ever changed.
>               u16 host_fs_selector;
>               u16 host_gs_selector;
>               u16 host_tr_selector;
> +             u64 secondary_vm_exit_controls;
>       };
>  
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h 
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> index 2ff26f53cd62..299554708e37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ struct hv_enlightened_vmcs {
>       u64 host_ssp;
>       u64 host_ia32_int_ssp_table_addr;
>       u64 padding64_6;
> +     u64 secondary_vm_exit_controls;

(I think Jeremi has asked a similar question but just to be sure)

This doesn't seem to be present in the currently available TLFS version
e.g. here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/tlfs/datatypes/hv_vmx_enlightened_vmcs

That wouldn't be the first time when TLFS lags behind but as I don't see
anyone from Microsoft signing this off, let me ask: where did you get
this information and, in case it came from someone @microsoft.com, can
we get their sign-off on the patch?

>  } __packed;
>  
>  #define HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_NONE                  0
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> index e8f3ad0f79ee..caf38a54856c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct nested_vmx_msrs {
>       u32 pinbased_ctls_high;
>       u32 exit_ctls_low;
>       u32 exit_ctls_high;
> +     u64 secondary_exit_ctls;
>       u32 entry_ctls_low;
>       u32 entry_ctls_high;
>       u32 misc_low;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c
> index 313b8bb5b8a7..b8cd53601a00 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,10 @@
>        VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER |                                       \
>        VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS |                                        \
>        VM_EXIT_PT_CONCEAL_PIP |                                       \
> -      VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> +      VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL |                                  \
> +      VM_EXIT_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS)
> +
> +#define EVMCS1_SUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL2 (0ULL)
>  
>  #define EVMCS1_SUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL                                        
> \
>       (VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |                           \
> @@ -315,6 +318,8 @@ const struct evmcs_field vmcs_field_to_evmcs_1[] = {
>                    HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_CONTROL_GRP1),
>       EVMCS1_FIELD(VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, vm_exit_controls,
>                    HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_CONTROL_GRP1),
> +     EVMCS1_FIELD(SECONDARY_VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, secondary_vm_exit_controls,
> +                  HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_CONTROL_GRP1),
>       EVMCS1_FIELD(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, secondary_vm_exec_control,
>                    HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_CONTROL_GRP1),
>       EVMCS1_FIELD(GUEST_ES_LIMIT, guest_es_limit,
> @@ -464,6 +469,7 @@ enum evmcs_revision {
>  
>  enum evmcs_ctrl_type {
>       EVMCS_EXIT_CTRLS,
> +     EVMCS_2NDEXIT,
>       EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS,
>       EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL,
>       EVMCS_2NDEXEC,
> @@ -477,6 +483,9 @@ static const u32 
> evmcs_supported_ctrls[NR_EVMCS_CTRLS][NR_EVMCS_REVISIONS] = {
>       [EVMCS_EXIT_CTRLS] = {
>               [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_SUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL,
>       },
> +     [EVMCS_2NDEXIT] = {
> +             [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_SUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL2,
> +     },
>       [EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS] = {
>               [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_SUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL,
>       },

What's the desired effect here? I.e. why exposing
VM_EXIT_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS when none of the controls are going
to be exposed?

> @@ -539,6 +548,9 @@ void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *
>                       supported_ctrls &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
>               ctl_high &= supported_ctrls;
>               break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS2:
> +             ctl_low &= evmcs_get_supported_ctls(EVMCS_2NDEXIT);
> +             break;
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS:
>               supported_ctrls = evmcs_get_supported_ctls(EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS);
> @@ -589,6 +601,10 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>                                              vmcs12->vm_exit_controls)))
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> +     if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_2NDEXIT,
> +                                            
> vmcs12->secondary_vm_exit_controls)))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS,
>                                              vmcs12->vm_entry_controls)))
>               return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index ff07d6e736a2..d6341845df43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -1411,6 +1411,7 @@ int vmx_set_vmx_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 
> msr_index, u64 data)
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS:
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS:
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS:
> +     case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS2:
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
>               /*
>                * The "non-true" VMX capability MSRs are generated from the
> @@ -1489,6 +1490,9 @@ int vmx_get_vmx_msr(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 
> msr_index, u64 *pdata)
>               if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS)
>                       *pdata |= VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
>               break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS2:
> +             *pdata = msrs->secondary_exit_ctls;
> +             break;
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS:
>       case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
>               *pdata = vmx_control_msr(
> @@ -1692,6 +1696,8 @@ static void copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx 
> *vmx, u32 hv_clean_fields
>               vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control =
>                       evmcs->pin_based_vm_exec_control;
>               vmcs12->vm_exit_controls = evmcs->vm_exit_controls;
> +             vmcs12->secondary_vm_exit_controls =
> +                     evmcs->secondary_vm_exit_controls;
>               vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control =
>                       evmcs->secondary_vm_exec_control;
>       }
> @@ -1894,6 +1900,7 @@ static void copy_vmcs12_to_enlightened(struct vcpu_vmx 
> *vmx)
>        * evmcs->vmcs_link_pointer = vmcs12->vmcs_link_pointer;
>        * evmcs->pin_based_vm_exec_control = vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control;
>        * evmcs->vm_exit_controls = vmcs12->vm_exit_controls;
> +      * evmcs->secondary_vm_exit_controls = 
> vmcs12->secondary_vm_exit_controls;
>        * evmcs->secondary_vm_exec_control = vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control;
>        * evmcs->page_fault_error_code_mask =
>        *              vmcs12->page_fault_error_code_mask;
> @@ -2411,6 +2418,11 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, 
> struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
>               exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
>       vm_exit_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>  
> +     if (exec_control & VM_EXIT_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS) {
> +             exec_control = __secondary_vm_exit_controls_get(vmcs01);
> +             secondary_vm_exit_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
> +     }
> +
>       /*
>        * Interrupt/Exception Fields
>        */
> @@ -6819,13 +6831,17 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_exit_ctls(struct 
> vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
>               VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE |
>  #endif
>               VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PAT | VM_EXIT_SAVE_IA32_PAT |
> -             VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS;
> +             VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS | VM_EXIT_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
>       msrs->exit_ctls_high |=
>               VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |
>               VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER | VM_EXIT_SAVE_IA32_EFER |
>               VM_EXIT_SAVE_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER | VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT |
>               VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
>  
> +     /* secondary exit controls */
> +     if (msrs->exit_ctls_high & VM_EXIT_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS)
> +             rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS2, msrs->secondary_exit_ctls);
> +
>       /* We support free control of debug control saving. */
>       msrs->exit_ctls_low &= ~VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c
> index 106a72c923ca..98457d7b2b23 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ const unsigned short vmcs12_field_offsets[] = {
>       FIELD(PAGE_FAULT_ERROR_CODE_MATCH, page_fault_error_code_match),
>       FIELD(CR3_TARGET_COUNT, cr3_target_count),
>       FIELD(VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, vm_exit_controls),
> +     FIELD(SECONDARY_VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, secondary_vm_exit_controls),
>       FIELD(VM_EXIT_MSR_STORE_COUNT, vm_exit_msr_store_count),
>       FIELD(VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, vm_exit_msr_load_count),
>       FIELD(VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS, vm_entry_controls),
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h
> index 01936013428b..f50f897b9b5f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ struct __packed vmcs12 {
>       u16 host_gs_selector;
>       u16 host_tr_selector;
>       u16 guest_pml_index;
> +     u64 secondary_vm_exit_controls;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -358,6 +359,7 @@ static inline void vmx_check_vmcs12_offsets(void)
>       CHECK_OFFSET(host_gs_selector, 992);
>       CHECK_OFFSET(host_tr_selector, 994);
>       CHECK_OFFSET(guest_pml_index, 996);
> +     CHECK_OFFSET(secondary_vm_exit_controls, 998);
>  }
>  
>  extern const unsigned short vmcs12_field_offsets[];
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 63e543c6834b..96ad139adc3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ void kvm_spurious_fault(void);
>   * associated feature that KVM supports for nested virtualization.
>   */
>  #define KVM_FIRST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR   MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC
> -#define KVM_LAST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR    MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC
> +#define KVM_LAST_EMULATED_VMX_MSR    MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS2
>  
>  #define KVM_DEFAULT_PLE_GAP          128
>  #define KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_WINDOW   4096

-- 
Vitaly


Reply via email to