4.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
commit 66eefe5de11db1e0d8f2edc3880d50e7c36a9d43 upstream.
Calling e.g. blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() after calls to
disk_stack_limits() discards the settings determined by
disk_stack_limits().
So we need to make those calls first.
Fixes: 199dc6ed5179 ("md/raid0: update queue parameter in a safer location.")
Reported-by: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/raid0.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -431,12 +431,6 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev
struct md_rdev *rdev;
bool discard_supported = false;
- rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
- disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
- rdev->data_offset << 9);
- if (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(rdev->bdev)))
- discard_supported = true;
- }
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(mddev->queue,
mddev->chunk_sectors);
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue,
mddev->chunk_sectors);
@@ -445,6 +439,12 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev
blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue,
(mddev->chunk_sectors << 9) *
mddev->raid_disks);
+ rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
+ disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+ rdev->data_offset << 9);
+ if (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(rdev->bdev)))
+ discard_supported = true;
+ }
if (!discard_supported)
queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD,
mddev->queue);
else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
