On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:22:00 +0100
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > static __inline__ int __test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr)
> > {
> > int oldbit;
> >
> > __asm__(
> > "btsl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
> > :"=r" (oldbit),"+m" (ADDR)
> > :"dIr" (nr));
> > return oldbit;
> > }
> >
> > explodes with gcc-3.4.4.
>
> Known issue. The new form is correct and needed, but the old gcc doesn't
> accept
> it. I haven't gotten a form that is both and correct and works on the old
> compiler
> out of the gcc hackers I asked.
Oh, thanks.
What does "d" do, btw? My gcc info page only covers "x86" and says only "`d'
register"
(And, more importantly, where is the best description of gcc asm constraints?)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
