On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:15:06AM -0700, Drew Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:21:12PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:36:45AM -0700, Drew Richardson wrote:
> > > > Add additional information about the ARM architected hardware events
> > > > to make counters self describing. This makes the hardware PMUs easier
> > > > to use as perf list contains possible events instead of users having
> > > > to refer to documentation like the ARM TRMs.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Drew Richardson <drew.richard...@arm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 121
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 1 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > > > index 2365a32a595e..e933d2dd71c0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > > > @@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static void armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> > > > .stop = armpmu_stop,
> > > > .read = armpmu_read,
> > > > .filter_match = armpmu_filter_match,
> > > > + .attr_groups = armpmu->pmu.attr_groups,
> > >
> > > I don't understand this hunk. What's it doing?
> >
> > I'm not 100% clear either on what it's doing. But without this line
> > the attr_groups don't get passed on and I don't see them on my TC2. I
> > debugged the issue down to this but it may not be the proper way to
> > solve the problem.
>
> Oh yuck, it's because we call armpmu_init after cpu_pmu_init and the former
> uses struct initialisation and ends up zeroing anything set previously.
>
> We should probably tidy all this up:
>
> * Remove armpmu_register and call perf_pmu_register directly from
> arm_pmu_device_probe instead
>
> * Call armpmu_init immediately prior to arm_cpu_init
Assuming you mean cpu_pmu_init, how about the below?
Thanks,
Mark.
---->8----
>From f8a99a406f3dd7a272a6dee4a551436fea851f38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:32:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/perf: kill armpmu_register
Nothing outside of drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c should call armpmu_register
any more, so it no longer needs to be in include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h.
Additionally, by folding it in to arm_pmu_device_probe we can allow
drivers to override struct pmu fields without getting blatted by the
armpmu code.
This patch folds armpmu_register into arm_pmu_device_probe. The logging
to the console is moved to after the PMU is successfully registered with
the core perf code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Drew Richardson <drew.richard...@arm.com>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 14 +++++---------
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index f346960..15463cb 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -583,14 +583,6 @@ static void armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
};
}
-int armpmu_register(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int type)
-{
- armpmu_init(armpmu);
- pr_info("enabled with %s PMU driver, %d counters available\n",
- armpmu->name, armpmu->num_events);
- return perf_pmu_register(&armpmu->pmu, armpmu->name, type);
-}
-
/* Set at runtime when we know what CPU type we are. */
static struct arm_pmu *__oprofile_cpu_pmu;
@@ -934,14 +926,18 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
goto out_free;
}
+ armpmu_init(pmu);
ret = cpu_pmu_init(pmu);
if (ret)
goto out_free;
- ret = armpmu_register(pmu, -1);
+ ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, pmu->name, -1);
if (ret)
goto out_destroy;
+ pr_info("enabled with %s PMU driver, %d counters available\n",
+ pmu->name, pmu->num_events);
+
return 0;
out_destroy:
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index bfa673b..83b5e34 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -111,8 +111,6 @@ struct arm_pmu {
#define to_arm_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_pmu, pmu))
-int armpmu_register(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int type);
-
u64 armpmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event);
int armpmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
