On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:43AM -0700, tip-bot for Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Commit-ID: 4115ffdf4d6f8986a7abe1dd522c163f599bc0e6
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4115ffdf4d6f8986a7abe1dd522c163f599bc0e6
> Author: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:28:07 +0300
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:44:06 +0200
>
> compiler, atomics: Provide READ_ONCE_NOCHECK()
>
> Some code may perform racy by design memory reads. This could be
> harmless, yet such code may produce KASAN warnings.
>
> To hide such accesses from KASAN this patch introduces
> READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() macro. KASAN will not check the memory
> accessed by READ_ONCE_NOCHECK().
>
> This patch creates __read_once_size_nocheck() a clone of
> __read_once_size_check() (renamed __read_once_size()).
> The only difference between them is 'no_sanitized_address'
> attribute appended to '*_nocheck' function. This attribute tells
> the compiler that instrumentation of memory accesses should not
> be applied to that function. We declare it as static
> '__maybe_unsed' because GCC is not capable to inline such
> function: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
>
> With KASAN=n READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() is just a clone of READ_ONCE().
So I add READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() for accesses for which the compiler cannot
prove safe address for KASAN's benefit, but READ_ONCE() suffices for
the data-race-detection logic in KTSAN, correct?
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@google.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com>
> Cc: Kostya Serebryany <k...@google.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Wolfram Gloger <wm...@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de>
> Cc: kasan-dev <kasan-...@googlegroups.com>
> Link:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444750088-24444-2-git-send-email-aryabi...@virtuozzo.com
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 13 ++++++++++
> include/linux/compiler.h | 60
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> index dfaa7b3..f2a9aec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> @@ -237,12 +237,25 @@
> #define KASAN_ABI_VERSION 3
> #endif
>
> +#if GCC_VERSION >= 40902
> +/*
> + * Tell the compiler that address safety instrumentation (KASAN)
> + * should not be applied to that function.
> + * Confilcts with inlining:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
> + */
> +#define __no_sanitize_address __attribute__((no_sanitize_address))
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* gcc version >= 40000 specific checks */
>
> #if !defined(__noclone)
> #define __noclone /* not needed */
> #endif
>
> +#if !defined(__no_sanitize_address)
> +#define __no_sanitize_address
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * A trick to suppress uninitialized variable warning without generating any
> * code
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index c836eb2..aa2ae4c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -198,19 +198,42 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f,
> int val, int expect);
>
> #include <uapi/linux/types.h>
>
> -static __always_inline void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void
> *res, int size)
> +#define __READ_ONCE_SIZE \
> +({ \
> + switch (size) { \
> + case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break; \
> + case 2: *(__u16 *)res = *(volatile __u16 *)p; break; \
> + case 4: *(__u32 *)res = *(volatile __u32 *)p; break; \
> + case 8: *(__u64 *)res = *(volatile __u64 *)p; break; \
> + default: \
> + barrier(); \
> + __builtin_memcpy((void *)res, (const void *)p, size); \
> + barrier(); \
> + } \
> +})
> +
> +static __always_inline
> +void __read_once_size_check(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
> {
> - switch (size) {
> - case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break;
> - case 2: *(__u16 *)res = *(volatile __u16 *)p; break;
> - case 4: *(__u32 *)res = *(volatile __u32 *)p; break;
> - case 8: *(__u64 *)res = *(volatile __u64 *)p; break;
> - default:
> - barrier();
> - __builtin_memcpy((void *)res, (const void *)p, size);
> - barrier();
> - }
> + __READ_ONCE_SIZE;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> +/*
> + * This function is not 'inline' because __no_sanitize_address confilcts
> + * with inlining. Attempt to inline it may cause a build failure.
> + * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
> + * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings.
> + */
> +static __no_sanitize_address __maybe_unused
> +void __read_once_size_nocheck(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
> +{
> + __READ_ONCE_SIZE;
> }
> +#else
> +static __always_inline __alias(__read_once_size_check)
> +void __read_once_size_nocheck(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size);
> +#endif
>
> static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res,
> int size)
> {
> @@ -248,8 +271,19 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile
> void *p, void *res, int s
> * required ordering.
> */
>
> -#define READ_ONCE(x) \
> - ({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x),
> __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
> +#define __READ_ONCE(x, check) \
> +({ \
> + union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
> + __read_once_size##check(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
> + __u.__val; \
> +})
> +#define READ_ONCE(x) __READ_ONCE(x, _check)
> +
> +/*
> + * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need
> + * to hide memory access from KASAN.
> + */
> +#define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x) __READ_ONCE(x, _nocheck)
>
> #define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
> ({ \
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
