From: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com>
GFP_RECLAIM_MASK was introduced in commit 6cb062296f73 ("Categorize GFP
flags"). In slub subsystem, this macro controls slub's allocation
behavior. In particular, some flags which are not in GFP_RECLAIM_MASK
will be cleared. So when slub pass this new gfp_flag into page
allocator, we might lost some very important flags.
There are some mistakes when we introduce __GFP_NO_KSWAPD. This flag is
used to avoid any scheduler-related codes recursive. But it seems like
patch author forgot to add it into GFP_RECLAIM_MASK. So lets add it now.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix....@intel.com>
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index f92cbd2..9ebad4d 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
/* Control page allocator reclaim behavior */
#define GFP_RECLAIM_MASK (__GFP_WAIT|__GFP_HIGH|__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS|\
__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_NOFAIL|\
- __GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_MEMALLOC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC)
+ __GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_MEMALLOC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC|\
+ __GFP_NO_KSWAPD)
/* Control slab gfp mask during early boot */
#define GFP_BOOT_MASK (__GFP_BITS_MASK & ~(__GFP_WAIT|__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS))
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
