> -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com] > Sent: 12 October, 2015 19:31 > To: Bastien Nocera > Cc: Mark Rutland; Tirdea, Irina; Aleksei Mamlin; Karsten Merker; > linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; Purdila, Octavian; lkml; > devicet...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] Input: goodix - sort includes using inverse Xmas > tree order > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:51 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 16:39 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> > > Why? > >> > > >> > It was already discussed in the thread for a previous version, > >> > please > >> > refer to that. > >> > >> Fine, but surely that should be in the commit message, to prevent > >> others > >> like myself repeatedly asking the same question? > > > > Fair point. Irina? > > No, let's just leave poor includes alone. >
OK, will drop this :) Thanks, Irina > -- > Dmitry
