On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 00:30 +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> The <linux/memblock.h> provides memblock_is_memory() function that
> tries to find a given physical address in the memblock.memory.regions.
> Let's use this function instead of direct coding of the same functionality.

Are you sure it implements exactly the same logic?

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index 22d94c3..85b462b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@ -82,11 +82,9 @@ int page_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
>       return pfn < max_pfn;
>  #else
>       unsigned long paddr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> -     struct memblock_region *reg;
> 
> -     for_each_memblock(memory, reg)
> -             if (paddr >= reg->base && paddr < (reg->base + reg->size))
> -                     return 1;
> +     if (memblock_is_memory(paddr))
> +             return 1;
>       return 0;

Why not just return memblock_is_memory(paddr) ?

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to